>
Vanwege een storing is dit bericht naderhand toegevoegd aan het archief. ------- Forwarded message follows ------- From: geno@zap.a2000.nl To: ngin <ngin@icsenglish.com>, duurzaamlijst@ddh.nl Date sent: Fri, 25 May 2001 00:58:40 +0200 Subject: [Duurzaamlijst] Dust Bowl Threatening China's Future Forward from another list. On 24 May 2001, at 12:41, Misha wrote: Howdy, all-- From Worldwatch. Thought it might interest you soil watchers, planet lovers, and similar ilk. peace mish ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >Published on Thursday, May 24, 2001 > > Dust Bowl Threatening China's Future > by Lester Brown > > On April 18, scientists at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric >Administration (NOAA) > laboratory in Boulder, Colorado, reported that a huge dust storm > from >northern China had > reached the United States "blanketing areas from Canada to Arizona > with a >layer of dust." > They reported that along the foothills of the Rockies the mountains > were >obscured by the > dust from China. > > This dust storm did not come as a surprise. On March 10, 2001, The > People's >Daily > reported that the season's first dust storm-one of the earliest on >record-had hit Beijing. > These dust storms, coupled with those of last year, were among the > worst in >memory, > signaling a widespread deterioration of the rangeland and cropland > in the >country's vast > northwest. > > These huge dust plumes routinely travel hundreds of miles to > populous >cities in > northeastern China, including Beijing, obscuring the sun, reducing >visibility, slowing traffic, > and closing airports. Reports of residents in eastern cities > caulking >windows with old rags to > keep out the dust are reminiscent of the U.S. dust bowl of the > 1930s. >Eastward moving > winds often carry soil from China's northwest to North Korea, South > Korea, >and Japan, > countries that regularly complain about dust clouds that both filter > out >the sunlight and cover > everything with dust. Responding to pressures from their > constituents, a >group of 15 > legislators from Japan and 8 from South Korea are organizing a > tri-national >committee with > Chinese lawmakers to devise a strategy to combat the dust. > > News reports typically attribute the dust storms to the drought of > the last >three years, but > the drought is simply bringing a fast-deteriorating situation into > focus. >Human pressure on > the land in northwestern China is excessive. There are too many > people, too >many cattle > and sheep, and too many plows. Feeding 1.3 billion people, a > population >nearly five times > that of the United States, is not an easy matter. > > In addition to local pressures on resources, a decision in Beijing > in 1994 >to require that all > cropland used for construction be offset by land reclaimed elsewhere > has >helped create the > ecological disaster that is now unfolding. In an article in Land Use >Policy, Chinese > geographers Hong Yang and Xiubein Li describe the environmental > effects of >this offset > policy. The fast-growing coastal provinces, such as Guandong, > Shandong, >Xheijiang, and > Jiangsu, which are losing cropland to urban expansion and industrial >construction, are > paying other provinces to plow new land to offset their losses. This >provided an initial > economic windfall for provinces in the northwest, such as Inner > Mongolia >(which led the way > with a 22-percent cropland expansion), Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and >Xinjiang. > > As the northwestern provinces, already suffering from overplowing > and >overgrazing, plowed > ever more marginal land, wind erosion intensified. Now accelerating > wind >erosion of soil and > the resulting land abandonment are forcing people to migrate > eastward, not >unlike the U.S. > westward migration from the southern Great Plains to California > during the >Dust Bowl years. > > While plows are clearing land, expanding livestock populations are > denuding >the land of > vegetation. Following economic reforms in 1978 and the removal of > controls >on the size of > herds and flocks that collectives could maintain, livestock > populations >grew rapidly. Today > China has 127 million cattle compared with 98 million in the United > States. >Its flock of 279 > million sheep and goats compares with only 9 million in the United > States. > > In Gonge County in eastern Quinghai Province, the number of sheep > that >local grasslands > can sustain is estimated at 3.7 million, but by the end of 1998, > sheep >numbers there had > reached 5.5 million, far beyond the land's carrying capacity. The > result is >fast-deteriorating > grassland, desertification, and the formation of sand dunes. > > In the New York Times, Beijing Bureau Chief Erik Eckholm writes that > "the >rising sands are > part of a new desert forming here on the eastern edge of the > Quinghai-Tibet >Plateau, a > legendary stretch once known for grass reaching as high as a horse's > belly >and home for > centuries to ethnic Tibetan herders." Official estimates show 900 > square >miles (2,330 > square kilometers) of land going to desert each year. An area > several times >as large is > suffering a decline in productivity as it is degraded by overuse. > > In addition to the direct damage from overplowing and overgrazing, > the >northern half of China > is literally drying out as rainfall declines and aquifers are > depleted by >overpumping. Water > tables are falling almost everywhere, gradually altering the > region's >hydrology. As water > tables fall, springs dry up, streams no longer flow, lakes > disappear, and >rivers run dry. U.S. > satellites, which have been monitoring land use in China for some 30 > years, >show that > literally thousands of lakes in the North have disappeared. > > Deforestation in southern and eastern China is reducing the moisture >transported inland > from the South China Sea, the East China Sea, and the Yellow Sea, > writes >Wang > Hongchang, a Fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Where > land >is forested, > the water is held and evaporates to be carried further inland. When > tree >cover is removed, > the initial rainfall from the inland-moving, moisture-laden air > simply runs >off and returns to > the sea. As this recycling of rainfall inland is weakened by > deforestation, >rainfall in the > interior is declining. > > Reversing this degradation means stabilizing population and planting > trees >everywhere > possible to help recycle rainfall inland. It means converting highly >erodible cropland back to > grassland or woodland, reducing the livestock population, and > planting tree >shelter belts > across the windswept areas of cropland, as U.S. farmers did to end > dust >storms in the > 1930s. > > In addition, another interesting option now presents itself-the use > of wind >turbines as > windbreaks to reduce wind speed and soil erosion. With the cost of >wind-generated > electricity now competitive with that generated from fossil fuels, >constructing rows of wind > turbines in strategic areas to slow the wind could greatly reduce > the >erosion of soil. This > also affords an opportunity to phase out the use of wood for fuel, > thus >lightening the > pressure on forests. > > The economics are extraordinarily attractive. In the U.S. Great > Plains, >under conditions > similar to China's northwest, a large advanced design wind turbine >occupying a tenth of a > hectare of land can produce $100,000 worth of electricity per year. > This >source of rural > economic regeneration fits in nicely with China's plan to develop > the >impoverished > northwest. > > Reversing desertification will require a huge effort, but if the > dust bowl >continues to spread, it > will not only undermine the economy, but it will also trigger a > massive >migration eastward. > The options are clear: Reduce livestock populations to a sustainable > level >or face heavy > livestock losses as grassland turns to desert. Return highly > erodible >cropland to grassland > or lose all of the land's productive capacity as it turns to desert. >Construct windbreaks with > a combination of trees and, where feasible, wind turbines, to slow > the wind >or face even > more soil losses and dust storms. > > If China cannot quickly arrest the trends of deterioration, the > growth of >the dust bowl could > acquire an irreversible momentum. What is at stake is not just > China's >soil, but its future. > > Lester Brown, is the President of the Earth Policy Institute. > > Copyright Earth Policy Institute 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------- De Duurzaamlijst: | Abonnement opzeggen? Stuur een E-mail aan: voor nieuws, | majordomo@ddh.nl en schrijf in het tekstdeel: opinie en overleg | unsubscribe duurzaamlijst ----------------------------------------------------------------- Meer over de Duurzaamlijst op http://www.ddh.nl/duurzaam